- Cnc simulator fuel code manual#
- Cnc simulator fuel code verification#
- Cnc simulator fuel code software#
Unlike CAM verification, the machine features, components, fixtures and stock are identical to the physical process and it offers accurate feature-rich models, cylinders, cones and so on.
Cnc simulator fuel code software#
This is the exact same G-Code that runs within the NC system of the machine, so the software is able to carry out a comprehensive machine simulation based on the same data that will operate the machine.
Cnc simulator fuel code verification#
Independent G-Code verification software such as Vericut verifies post-processed G-Code instead of the CL data. Independent G-Code verification is the only way So, how can you trust a post-processor driven simulation? Who checks the validity of the post-processor?
There are some verification systems out there that state: “we’re simulating the actual G-Code.” What they are actually doing is posting it and simulating it at the same time and they are projecting what their post is supposed to be doing. Most CAM verification will use component software for machine simulation, an outsourced generically integrated third party plugin to the software and it is mainly just for material removal and not actually simulating the actual machine motion. The post-processor itself can also introduce errors that could damage the part or the machine. While machine reference locations such as ‘going home’, where is ‘home’ and how does it get there – as well as tool change locations including where does it need to go and how does it get there, are another major limitation of internal CAM verification systems. In addition, getting true parameters from the machine such as rotary behaviour, shortest distance and so on, is problematic. It is not running the exact same thing that the actual machine is running so there will be differences – in essence it is guessing and projecting what the machine will do as opposed to representing what it will actually do.
This is, of course, one of the main hurdles for CAM simulation and verification.Īny simulation that runs on CL data cannot be fully trusted. In reality, this means the CAM system is simulating something different to what the machine will actually run. However, despite advances made within the CAM systems they are still limited when compared to independent third party simulation systems, such as Vericut from CGTech.ĬAM systems offer varying levels of verification based on CL data that has been post-processed into machine specific G-Code. Many CAM packages will accurately simulate machine motion and are often used to give feedback about the overall machining process.
Cnc simulator fuel code manual#
Especially on complex multi-axis machining systems.Īn alternative to the manual prove-out is to apply CAM simulation and verification software.
The machine is held up, production time is occupied and the chances of missing an error that could ultimately result in a very costly crash are extremely high. With multiple lines of code, NC program errors are a common cause of machine crashes and the two main origins are programmer mistakes (we are only human) and errors introduced by the CAM system’s post-processor.įor programmers and machinists the task of manually proving out a process can be a slow – checking line by line, block by block to make sure there are no errors in the program. While everyone involved with CNC machining understands the importance of checking and verifying the machining process before applying a cutting tool to the raw material, you should consider what are you really checking? More importantly what are you missing? Alongside the potential damage to production capacity there is the prospect of negatively harming the reputation of your business. With so much at stake, including the value of the raw or partially completed material, the cutting tools and workholding systems, as well as the structural integrity of the machine tool itself, any NC programming errors will always prove to be costly.